Geraldo Rivera Calls Out ICE Narrative After Minneapolis Shooting | Video Evidence Sparks Debate

 

Geraldo Rivera Rejects ICE Explanation in Minneapolis Shooting, Says Video Tells the Real Story

Veteran journalist and television personality Geraldo Rivera has sharply criticized federal officials over their explanation of a fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis, arguing that recorded video evidence directly contradicts the official narrative.

Controversy Surrounds Deadly Minneapolis ICE Shooting

The incident occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis, where Renee Nicole Good, a U.S. citizen, was shot and killed by an ICE agent. Authorities initially stated that the use of force was justified, claiming the victim posed an imminent threat during the encounter.

However, public release of surveillance and body-camera footage has fueled widespread debate, prompting questions from journalists, civil rights advocates, and local officials.

Geraldo Rivera: “It’s All on Tape”

Rivera took to social media to dismiss what he described as “spin” from federal agencies, emphasizing that the video footage shows a very different sequence of events. According to Rivera, the recordings suggest the victim was attempting to leave the scene rather than threatening officers.

“It’s all on tape,” Rivera stated, urging the public to rely on visual evidence rather than official talking points.

Local Leaders Push Back Against Federal Claims

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and other Minnesota officials have echoed concerns raised by Rivera, openly disputing the federal government’s account. City leaders have demanded a full and transparent investigation, calling for accountability and independent review.

The shooting has intensified tensions between local authorities and federal immigration agencies, particularly over enforcement practices within major U.S. cities.

National Debate Over ICE Use of Force

The Minneapolis case has reignited a national conversation about ICE operations, use of force, and public transparency. As investigations continue, pressure is mounting on federal officials to release all available footage and provide a clear, evidence-based explanation of what happened.

With public trust at stake, critics argue that video evidence — not press statements — should guide the final judgment.